From:
International
Federation for East Timor (IFET)
2001 Constituent Assembly
Elections Observer Project
Contact in East Timor:
Charles Scheiner
(0417)923273 or +61-417-923273
ifet@etan.org
During the 1999 Popular Consultation in East Timor, IFET organized the largest international observer mission, with 140 volunteer observers from two dozen countries living for weeks in every district of East Timor. We hoped to help shield the East Timorese people from Indonesian military violence and to demonstrate that the people of the world were with them in their struggle for self-determination.
Although Indonesian military and militia
violence is not a factor in the current elections, and although these elections
are but one step is a several-year-long process of nation-building, IFET
decided to organize a small observer project. We accredited 20 observers
from nine countries, and observed in eight districts. In addition, IFET
collaborated with veterans of our 1999 Observer Project who were accredited
through the Free East Timor Foundation (Netherlands) and the Osaka
East Timor Association (Japan). Several members of La’o
Hamutuk, a local NGO which has closely followed the nation-building
process for more than a year, and of the Judicial
System Monitoring Programme, also served as IFET observers.
As discussed below, this election is a small but important part of the larger process of nation-building, leading to a constitution, independence, and self-government. IFET believes that this step has been mounted successfully, but that significant obstacles remain for a truly democratic process.
The election process worked well, as evidenced by the turnout of more than 90%. We believe that the campaign and voting were largely free and fair, and that the results will accurately reflect the preferences of the people of East Timor within the limited issues and choices placed before them. Although the lack of discussion of constitutional issues during the campaign was disappointing, the political parties largely acted with decorum and respect, and few if any voters were coerced or intimidated. This is a good sign for the future of elections in East Timor.
In another area, however, the future is less promising. We are especially disappointed with the capacity-building aspect of the election. We observed great variation in competency among the District Electoral Officers (DEOs), all of whom were foreigners. Many had trouble communicating with the East Timorese staff, and the working relationship was often strained. East Timorese poll workers were frequently not included in the processes of opening and closing the polling places, but relegated to the repetitive administration of the voting. There is much that can be done to improve the working conditions and training for local staff, many who worked more than 10 hours without a break or food on election day. Their work assignments could have been more flexible or their numbers greater to allow voters to be processed more quickly.
Some flaws inflicted unnecessary hardship on the voters. Some voters were assigned to polling centers far from their homes (even in different districts). Within towns there appeared to be little geographic logic as to which center people were sent to. Others, especially those in hospital or prison, were disenfranchised by the lack of an absentee voting procedure and the requirement that voters vote only at their assigned center (see report from the Judicial System Monitoring Programme).
Another concern relates to insufficient
voter education leading up to the vote. Based on numerous interviews with
people after they voted, IFET observers found that many voters, particularly
older voters and women, did not know that this vote was to elect Constituent
Assembly members or the purpose of the Assembly.
IFET Observers reported problems resulting from the documented errors in the registration database, such as voters’ names missing or being registered at polling stations far from where they live, sometimes even in different districts. Voters were often directed to voting centers long distances from their villages, even if there were closer ones, adding to the time needed for voting and disenfranchising some in the late afternoon.
In Becora prison, only 48% of the eligible voters were actually able to vote, as the Judicial System Monitoring Programme report explains in detail. The lack of a provision for absentee voting disenfranchised people in hospitals, elderly, disabled and people in prison.
Voters in most polling centers we visited waited an average of 3-4 hours, and sometimes more than 6 hours, because of the slow identification process by the electoral roll officer. Where a second IEC staff member assisted this part of the process, queues were smaller and waiting time shorter.
In more than one case, DEOs did not know how to seal the ballot boxes or tamper-proof envelopes; in several instances they requested assistance from observers. During the voting day no provision was made for DEOs or local IEC staff to have lunch breaks.
In many polling centers, DEOs could not
communicate well with local staff or voters because of language problems.
Bearing in mind the total funds allocated for the election, training for
East Timorese IEC staff should have been better. IFET is particularly concerned
that the people of East Timor had few opportunities to learn how to organize
future elections on their own.
2. International staff should speak a local language to permit genuine collaboration.
3. Lists of voters should correspond better to voters’ actual area of residence, particularly in a sparsely populated country with limited transportation.
4. Provisions should be made for prisoners, people in hospitals, national observers, etc. to vote in other than their assigned polling centers.
5. There must be adequate staff
assigned to check voters on the election rolls.
DEMOCRACY IS MORE THAN JUST VOTING -
THE NEED FOR INCREASED
PARTICIPATION OF THE EAST TIMORESE PEOPLE
A primary concern is that the whole process is too rushed. The current timetable seems to mostly serve the concerns of United Nations member states and established political organizations, rather than grassroots East Timorese wishes as expressed by the NGO Forum’s Working Group on Constitutional Issues and the East Timorese Catholic Church.
Civic education started late because UNTAET initially failed to consult East Timorese on its design, leaving little time for this critical part of the democratic process. Even on election day, many voters did not understand that the vote was to choose Constituent Assembly members and/or the function of the Constituent Assembly. While a directive from the SRSG established Constitutional Commissions in each district, these commissions had only 45 days to educate a mostly illiterate public on complex constitutional issues and gather input. The Independent Electoral Commission’s work concentrated on the mechanics of the voting process, which naturally required much attention.
IFET is concerned that electoral regulations already adopted will potentially limit the options of the Constituent Assembly. The decision to have voters choose among political parties (rather than individuals or sectoral representatives) could preclude diverse views and open debate. The structure of the Assembly, as well as the regulatory encouragement for it to evolve into East Timor’s first elected legislature, may pre-empt decisions on the structure of the legislature. The elected members are unlikely to relinquish their positions to stand for another election.
During the election campaign, the political parties provided little information about their views on constitutional issues. A truly democratic process would involve more informed debate prior to the election.
IFET feels that the process by which international
and appointed institutions decided how the constitution would be defined
has not been adequately transparent. The Special Representative of the
Secretary General retains final say; there is an inherent contradiction
in building a democracy through processes that are not democratic or subject
to open scrutiny.
2. The Assembly should not be confined to a 90-day timetable. The Assembly will need to consider findings of the Constitutional Commission, consult with constitutional experts from around the world, and deal with concurrent legislative matters. If the Assembly decides to extend their 90-day existence, we encourage the SRSG to agree.
3. Draft constitutions should have been discussed during the campaign. However, there is still time to circulate such documents for feedback and public input, such as by holding public meetings throughout the country.
4. Particular efforts should be made to involve constituencies who may be marginalized from this process - such as people outside Dili, the rural population and women. We urge the Assembly to incorporate the Women’s Charter of Rights in East Timor into the Constitution.
5. Political parties should encourage
Assembly members to follow their individual judgment and input from their
constituencies, rather than enforcing party discipline. This will result
in a more thoughtful and appropriate approach to the constitutional debates,
and those elected will better represent all East Timorese people.
International
Federation for East Timor Updated Feb 13
The International Federation for East
Timor was founded in 1991 by East Timor solidarity groups from four continents
as a clearinghouse for non-governmental organization (NGO) initiatives
on East Timor and to support those initiatives, particularly in United
Nations fora. IFET is accredited with the U.N. Department of Public Information
and has a U.N. Representative in New York. Our secretariat is in the Philippines.
IFET participates in U.N. hearings and conferences, supplies analyses and
statements to the media, and lobbies the U.N.-Portugal-Indonesia East Timor
talks to ensure that the human and political rights of the East Timorese
people
are respected.
Email Charlie Scheiner: ifet@etan.org
Homepage:
http://etan.org/ifet
See also:
BD: 'Refugees' & Missing Persons - A collection of recent information, reports, articles and news
BD: Peoples' Participation / Participação Dos Povos / Partisipasaun Politika - A collection of recent media releases, reports and articles