Re: Meeting of 28 October 1997


Note: Some of these posts were prior to the meeting, being originated by a letter to Sixteen Bits, October 1997 by Elizabeth Ward.

Back to the Minutes for the 28 October 1997

Emil Joseph 22 Oct 1997 03:27:13 GMT
Basil Chupin22 Oct 97 23:02:20 +1000
Jim Hume 22 Oct 1997 22:22:35 GMT
Owen Cook 22 Oct 1997 23:14:40 GMT
Trevor Frew24 Oct 1997 11:24:02 +1000
Ken Meadows26 Oct 1997 18:09:21 GMT
Emil Joseph01 Nov 1997 11:05:37 GMT
Jeremy Bishop 2 Nov 1997 10:15:09 +1100
Brian Duke 2 Nov 1997 18:33:43 +1100
From: ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: What C&C should be like
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 03:27:13 GMT



I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. I
agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should be
like". 

I cannot recall what was so different between the meeting of 30
September and previous/subsequent meetings.

As it happens, I am one of those who believe that Coffee & Chat is
about computer hobbyists and users chatting about computers and
software in a social setting. I think that was the very idea that
prompted Gloria Robbins and others (Ann Byrne ?)  to start the group
in a Canberra park few years back. I haven't been attending the
meetings then, but I have attending meetings since late '94. It is
only in recent times (since last year, I think) that a focus was given
to 'problem solving'.

To my mind, the meetings of C&C are not ideal for 'problem solving'
other in the most superficial way. In my view, there is no way that
any person - however knowledgeable - able to diagnose and offer
solutions to verbal descriptions given by non-knowledgeable users. The
variety of hardware configurations and software mix defy any useful
answers, other than the most general and superficial kind. 

To "solve" computer problems meaningfully requires fronting the
machine question and fiddling with the software and hardware. Any
other way is pure guesswork and speculation, which invariably would
not work on the machine in question even if the guesswork is in fact
understood by the person who raised the problem at C&C. Ask any
computer support person!

PCUG has other opportunities for helping with "problem solving" -  we
have the internet clinic, we have training courses and we have
occasional demos. 

I happen to think for those reasons that a primary focus of C&C on
"problem solving' is misguided. Having said this, I hasten to add that
C&C as a **social group** has invariably led to users helping users in
problem solving in the practical sense that many a time fellow members
kindly came to my home and helped me out with problems that I had, and
many a time, I was at my fellow members' homes helping them with the
problems that they had.

I look forward to an opportunity at the next meeting of C&C on Tuesday
28 October to discuss the issue raised by Elizabeth in her published
letter.

Emil Joseph


Back to the top of the page

From: blchupin@pcug.org.au (Basil Chupin)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: What C&C should be like

ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph) writes:

>I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. 
>I  agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should 
>be  like". 

[deleted]

>As it happens, I am one of those who believe that Coffee & Chat is
>about computer hobbyists and users chatting about computers and
>software in a social setting. I think that was the very idea that
>prompted Gloria Robbins and others (Ann Byrne ?)  to start the 
>group  in a Canberra park few years back.

As far as I remember, Gloria Robins began the C & C back in late 1991 or early 
1992 purely as a social event for "senior citizens" and they met in a 
delightful and cosy room in the Lakeside Hotel.

While it was mainly a social gathering, information about computing was 
exchanged because (?)all were members of the PCUG. I recall being invited to 
attend their gathering as the Sysop and fended questions about the bulletin 
board, modems, etc. To facilitate the exchange of information by this group of 
people I created a (Fidonet) echomail area on the bulletin board for their use 
at the time.

----------------------------------------------------------
Basil Chupin         Internet: blchupin@pcug.org.au
                     Fidonet:  3.620.269.0 +61-6-285-2353
Canberra, A.C.T., Australia
----------------------------------------------------------
Back to the top of the page
From: jhume@pcug.org.au (James Hume)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: What C&C should be like
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:22:35 GMT


On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 03:27:13 GMT, ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph)
wrote:

>
>
>I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. I
>agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should be
>like". 
>
>I cannot recall what was so different between the meeting of 30
>September and previous/subsequent meetings.
>
>As it happens, I am one of those who believe that Coffee & Chat is
>about computer hobbyists and users chatting about computers and
>software in a social setting. I think that was the very idea that
>prompted Gloria Robbins and others (Ann Byrne ?)  to start the group
>in a Canberra park few years back.
snip
I agree with Emil. Essentially the subject matter is raised by members
present,and the whole meeting tends to be unstructured.
Attempts to define or structure the meetings have in the past led to
unmitigated disaster.
The real problem is I believe that the meetings are getting too large
The Cordinators(Chairpersons) have in my view done a great job and the
critiicisms are unjustified.
Jim

Back to the top of the page
From: rcook@pcug.org.au (Owen Cook)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: What C&C should be like
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:14:40 GMT


ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph) wrote:

>I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. I
>agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should be
>like". 

Below is Gloria Robbins original Charter for the group. As an
attendee of C&C I find the meetings more or less go along what
Gloria thought it would do.

For me it's a good break away from the house...and all that house
work :-)))))))))))))))) Besides the company is great too



Qoute

As the current coordinator of this new group, I would like to set
down for the benefit of newcomers what we do and what I would
like to see us do. We meet every second Tuesday at 10.30am for
two hours at the PCUG club room and newcomers are made welcome,
any business matters are discussed (this is a short segment as we
are very informal) and then we generally have a short talk from
one of the members or from an invited speaker.  The topics vary
from maintaining a printer in good condition to a member
describing the genealogy program they use or someone reporting on
the latest PCUG Monday night presentation. .
After the talk and ensuing questions, the meeting is open for
members'problems, solutions to problems and general discussion.

There are about fifteen regular members and we often have over
twenty people turn up for a cup or two of coffee, a chat with
fellow members and to supply or receive help to or from other
members.  As most of us have some free time during the day, we
are often able to visit other members' homes during the week and
help people solve their problems 'on site'.  Members have formed
close associations with others who have similar computing
interests.

A wide range of computer knowledge exists within the group.
Several members are part of the PCUG Volunteers scheme, helping
with Internet, staffing the Centre at weekends, assisting on the
Editorial committee and providing training courses.  Newcomers to
computing are always welcome and are offered help to set up their
system if this is required.

There are informal social events for members.  We have the
occasional lunch after a meeting, a Christmas party, and have
just had a very successful picnic by the lake on a glorious
autumn day.  It has been proposed that our next social event
should be a June lunch by an open fire at the George Harcourt
Inn.

I would like this Internet Coffee-Chat group to be a place where
PCUG members who are not able to attend our meetings or functions
can read what goes on at our meetings (summaries will be supplied
to this group) and enter their own ideas/problems/solutions.
Maybe they would like one or more of us to visit them.  There are
PCUG members not resident in Canberra - they might like to
contribute articles and also might like a day visit from some of
us.

It's your group - what would you like to see in it?

Gloria



end of quote
******************************************************
Coffee & Chat Page, inluding archives of past meetings
http://www.pcug.org.au/~rcook/c&c.htm
******************************************************

Back to the top of the page
From: tfrew@pcug.org.au (Trevor Frew)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: What C&C should be like
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 11:24:02 +1000


On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:14:40 GMT, rcook@pcug.org.au (Owen Cook) wrote:

>ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph) wrote:
>
>>I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. I
>>agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should be
>>like". 
>
>Below is Gloria Robbins original Charter for the group. As an
>attendee of C&C I find the meetings more or less go along what
>Gloria thought it would do.
>
>For me it's a good break away from the house...and all that house
>work :-)))))))))))))))) Besides the company is great too
>
<chopt>

An interesting philosophy and what a coffee and chat group should be,
and is, all about.

Keep up the good work everyone.

BTW, I won't be attending the "Melbourne Cup" meeting but I hope all
enjoy it.

Regards, Trevor
__________________________________________________________
Trevor Frew                              tfrew@pcug.org.au
	http://www.pcug.org.au/~tfrew
---

Back to the top of the page
From: kenmed@pcug.org.au (Ken Meadows)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: What C&C should be like
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 18:09:21 GMT

On Wed, 22 Oct 1997 03:27:13 GMT, ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph)
wrote:

>
>
>I read the Elizabeth Ward's letter to the editor in Sixteen Bits. I
>agree with her that we need to discuss "what Coffee & Chat should be
>like". 
>
>I cannot recall what was so different between the meeting of 30
>September and previous/subsequent meetings.
>
>As it happens, I am one of those who believe that Coffee & Chat is
>about computer hobbyists and users chatting about computers and
>software in a social setting. I think that was the very idea that
>prompted Gloria Robbins and others (Ann Byrne ?)  to start the group
>in a Canberra park few years back. I haven't been attending the
>meetings then, but I have attending meetings since late '94. It is
>only in recent times (since last year, I think) that a focus was given
>to 'problem solving'.
>
Much snipped.

While not an original, I started attending Coffee and Chat in the
early days when about 6 or 7 of us joined Gloria in Glebe Park - so
long ago I forget when. Years on the numbers grew and at Bobby McGees
we comfortably sat around the table in the make believe bush retreat.
Those attending did not, in the main, have expertise in computers but
we passed on our own experiences. I do not think we were absolute
beginners and we did not primarily  attend to learn about  computers
or to have our problems solved. It was a social occasion.

There are classes to  get you started in computers and a help
directory for the tricky question.

Bobby McGees, our third meeting place, was intimate, comfortable
(apart from the sometimes intrusive music) and the numbers about right
to keep it that way.

Jim Hume is right in that the numbers are now too great. I do not know
the answer and perhaps if the purpose and operation of the group were
discussed a solution may emerge.

See you all on Tuesday!

Ken.
Back to the top of the page
From: ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: C & C - 28 October 1997
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 11:05:37 GMT


On Sat, 01 Nov 1997 08:54:17 GMT, nevander@pcug.org.au (Neville
Anderson) wrote:

>	Peter asked if anyone present had installed IE4 and Jeff said
>that he had done so, it had taken half an hour, reorganised
>everything, and in his search for information on its operation, found
>that a book was already on sale in the book store.  Emil said that it
>auto-connected to the ISP, and John added that this was not very good
>with charged local calls, which do not exist in all other countries.

I did not install IE4. I said that I had Netscape 4 (Communicator) and
was happy with it, because it offered a way to choose which ISP
configuration I wished to work with.

From reading the article on IE4 in the Nov issue of Australian PC User
Magazine, I gather there are certain default settings in IE4 that
autoconnect with ISP. It seems that users of IE4 need to be aware of
those defaults and - if appropriate - change them. 

But as I said I had/have no personal experience with IE4. Perhaps a
user of IE4 could comment on IE4 in general and any auto-connect
feature in particular.

Emil




Back to the top of the page
From: jeremyb@newshost.pcug.org.au (Jeremy Bishop)
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: C & C - 28 October 1997
Date: 2 Nov 1997 10:15:09 +1100

ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph) writes:

>But as I said I had/have no personal experience with IE4. Perhaps a
>user of IE4 could comment on IE4 in general and any auto-connect
>feature in particular.

I have to say that I am not a user of IE4 (nor am I a fan of any M$
products), but I did see this on the net (in rec.humor.funny) ...

:-) :-) :-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!!

Dear Internet user,

It seems that the destructive minds who like to invent computer viruses have
struck again.  A new virus, popularly known as INTERNET EXPLORER 4.0, has
been propogating the Net for several weeks now.  MILLIONS of computers have
been infected by this insidious virus (mostly PCs, and a few Macintoshes as
well.)  This virus is one of the MOST DANGEROUS yet unleashed on the computing
public!

INTERNET EXPLORER 4.0 is known to have the following horrible effects on
infected computers:

  *	It WASTES an incredible amount of HARD DISK SPACE, space which could
	otherwise be used for productive applications

  *	It causes the infected computer's performance to be DRASTICALLY 
	REDUCED--Pentium machines which are stricken are known to slow down
	to the speed of a 486

  *	It surreptitiously MODIFIES the underlying operating system, causing
	the CORE FUNCTIONALITY of the instrument to change RADICALLY

  *	It, through the use of Trojan-like ALTERATIONS to the core Java
	APIs, may cause Java applets to MALFUNCTION.  These effects are so
	SEVERE that the designers of Java, Sun Microsystems, are taking LEGAL
	ACTION against the inventors of this terrible virus

  *	It, once installed, is VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the average user to
	remove from the system

  *	It is known to create SECURITY HOLES, which can allow unknown users
	to DELETE or DESTROY files on your hard drive

  *	It is known to cause many popular and reliable Internet browsers, 
	such as NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR and NETSCAPE COMMUNICATOR, to not function 
	correctly

  *	It is even known to infect NEWLY PURCHASED computers coming from
	repuatable manufacturers like COMPAQ and DELL.  These companies have
	so far been POWERLESS to prevent this virus from being installed on
	the computers they sell. 

  *	It is known to be UNDETECTABLE by most virus-checking software
	packages


The good news is that the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT is currently investigating the
rogue hackers who CONCOCTED this destructive virus.  They have been traced to 
a Seattle suburb, and may face fines of ONE MILLION DOLLARS PER DAY for the
pernicious manner in which this virus is being distributed.  The bad news is
that millions of computers have ALREADY BEEN INFECTED.  The inventors of this
virus even have the gall to gleefully BOAST about this terrible fact on their 
web site!

Here's what YOU can do:  

1)	If you see a website with the "Internet Explorer" logo, do **NOT**
	click on the logo.  This can cause this virus to be DOWNLOADED and
	INSTALLED on your system!

2)	If your computer is ALREADY INFECTED, and it's a Windows-based PC,
	call the technical support hotline at Microsoft (the company which
	wrote Windows), and ask them for instructions on how to DISABLE and
	REMOVE this virus.  They should have instructions to do so.

I apologize for the URGENT TONE of this message, but only if we WORK TOGETHER
can the spread of the dreaded INTERNET EXPLORER 4.0 virus be slowed or
stopped.

-- 
Selected by Jim Griffith.  MAIL your joke (jokes ONLY) to funny@clari.net.
If you see a problem with an RHF posting, reply to the poster please,
not to us.  Ask the poster to forward comments back to us if this is necessary.
For the full RHF guidelines, see http://comedy.clari.net/rhf/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
Jeremy Bishop          
jeremyb@canb.auug.org.au
Australian Unix User Group (AUUG) Canberra Chapter
Back to the top of the page
From: "Brian Duke" 
Newsgroups: tip.coffee-chat
Subject: Re: C & C - 28 October 1997
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 18:33:43 +1100


Jeremy Bishop wrote in message ...
>ejoseph@pcug.org.au (Emil Joseph) writes:
>
>>But as I said I had/have no personal experience with IE4. Perhaps a
>>user of IE4 could comment on IE4 in general and any auto-connect
>>feature in particular.
>
>I have to say that I am not a user of IE4 (nor am I a fan of any M$
>products), but I did see this on the net (in rec.humor.funny) ...
>
>:-) :-) :-)
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!! VIRUS WARNING!!!
>
>Snip

Perhaps on a more serious note I am using IE4 and more than happy with
the results.  I like the integration of mail and news in Outlook
Express.
The automatic  connection had me worried at one stage but can be
easily turned off.  You can subscribe to a variety of channels and
have them automatically updated, or you can update them when you are
on the web.  Personally I have steered clear of this particular
feature so far.
I find the browser itself easy to use, there are good features which
enable you to browse offline those web pages you have visited (using
the history feature) and the search and favourites folders/links are
very useable.
I experimented with the two betas before the final and as a word of
warning make sure that you uninstall these before trying to install
the final.
Some of the messages in the news groups refer to the fact that IE4 is
hard on video drivers also and that you need to have the latest
version, or DirectX5.  I have not had this problem and am running a
TopView128 card with drivers from Tseng dated July this year.
There has also been some suggestion that it is resource hungry and
that some systems may slow down.  The consensus seems to be that this
is even more so if you have not cleaned your system out recently.
Mine hasn't been cleaned in the last six months and I haven't noticed
any slowdown.  I am running an IBM P166, 32 meg of EDO ram and a 2.1
gig Quantum.
If anyone has any particular questions which I can help with I am
happy to try, but don't claim to be any sort of  an expert.

Brian


Back to the top of the page
Back to the Minutes for the 28 October 1997
Date 5 November 1997